The United States Interaction with the International Court of Justice O

The joined claims interaction with the International dally of justness Over Consular Rights How Our Refusal to Obey Is Impacting international Nationals and American Citizens On January 9, 2003, Mexico initiated proceedings before the International Court of Justice against the united States of America concerning the alleged violations of Articles 5 and 36 of the capital of Austria concourse basically, claiming that the joined States is not honoring the consular rights of foreign nationals within the United States . While the proceedings of this courtship continue on, as they will into 2004, it is spicy and instructive to look at the realities of consular telling in the United States. I have chosen to focus on Mexican and American interactions not just because they are the two countries rentd in the case before ICJ, but because the countries are so close, and because the issue arises so frequently. fit to Mark Warren, director of Human Rights Research, an Ottawa, Canada-bas ed company that monitors international developments regarding the death penalty, in that location are more then 50 Mexican citizens under prison term of death in the US, many of whose cases, in fact, Mexico would argue all of them, involve violations of international law (personal interview, 10/6/03). Through an examination of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR), American interpretation of this treaty, the fictional character of Mexican consulates in America, and the worldwide repercussions of American actions, I hope to loosely discuss this topic and possible solutions. It is further instructive to investigate the United States interactions with the World Court in previous cases, and possible implications of sub-par consular notification with respect to the current, post-9... ...Grand Case (Germany vs. the United States). fight release June27, 2001 The HagueInternational Court of Justice. Mexico brings a case against the United States of America and requests th e indication of provisional measures. Press release January 10, 2003 The Hague. James, Anne, and Mark Warren. Equal Protection Consular Assistance and evil JusticeProcedures in the USA. Woodbridge The International Justice Project, 2002.Rubin, James P. United States Department of State Press Statement. 4 November 1998.Warren, Mark. Article 36 Update Consular Rights in America Issue 21. Email to Tambi Cork. 6 May 2003.Warren, Mark. Personal Interview. 6 October 2003.World View Commentary. Ed. Doug Cassel. 8 July 2003. Northwestern University School ofLaw. 10 November 2003