Greek Independence

For centuries the classic population was completely below the footrest rule. The classicals independence from the Ottoman Turks in 1830 did not come without hardship and suffering. several(prenominal)(prenominal) other countries including Russia and France as well ask sides with Greece during this fight as they mat up close and connected with their destination. A society year war was fought which eventually resulted in the Greeks gaining independence from the Turks. During this time, the Greeks had to swear high morale and a strong disposition to be as booming as they were in the end. The circumstances they were under were difficult and harsh. umpteen muckle felt as though Greece deserved to break external from the Ottoman Empire, but some believed that the Turkish rule was not too oppressing. Most people believed that the people of Greece had great character and deserved to be free from the brutality of the Ottoman Turks. They were seen as having strong will to be indepen dent and worked together as a country to achieve that goal. Their assimilation still to this day is being represented in different forms of art, for mannequin architecture. Its been studied for old age because it served as a foundation for several other countries and is being kept alive, as opposed to forgotten.One poet, Alexandros Kalphoglou, expound the Greeks as being enlightened, educated, well-rounded people. He went on to say that they were actually open to and accepting of other cultures. Its not surprising that Kalphoglou wouldve felt this way because he was a Greek Christian and most seeming would be proud of his own history (Doc 4). Similarly, Percy Shelley was besides a poet who believed Greek culture was essential for all other cultures to grow. She, however, was an English romantic poet. Itd be seemed for her to praise Greece because romantic poets were all for the Greek mutation and independence (Doc 7).These two werent the only people who sh bed the correspo nding point of view on the Greek Revolt. While still under the Ottoman rule, Greek citizens were treated unfairly and poorly. Their living conditions were unstable and were forever in upheaval due to the massive rebellion. The entire whirling was sparked by the lack of support shown by the Turkish rulers toward the Greeks. The bright, upbeat, and beautiful presence of the Greek culture was robbed by the Turks according to Savary, a French scholar of Greek. As a person who most likely spent a mass of the time studying Greek history, he would be inclined to obeisance their culture (Doc 3).Sneyd Davis, an English writer, spoke of Athens being deteriorated and everything beautiful that erst existed there, vanishing. The events of what happened to the Greeks under the Ottomans can be easily related to this poem because their gazump in their past was diminished. Davis is another romantic poet so I would expect to see him pro-Greek revolution (Doc 1). A majority of people were please d with the event that Greece did gain its independence from the Ottoman Turkish Empire. They believed that Greeks should have their arts, language, and other forms of culture restored fully so that they could regain pride in themselves.People also thought that Greek revolution would result in more successful nations in the future, which would be based on Greek tradition. A folder called Greek exiles described the rise of Greek ancestors as heroes in history. It negotiation about how the Ottomans may have once been at power, but years later they didnt stand a chance against the Greeks (Doc 6). In regards to Mavrocordato, it was a strong act of courage for the Greeks to take their independence and basically work their own governing starting with nothing.Basically, he says that they wanted and made two-eyed violet for themselves, but worked hard to get to that point (Doc 10). In an engraving created in 1828, called Greece Sacrificed, Regnier has depicted a scene where the Turks a re attacking the Greeks, but not very successfully due to the fact that the Greeks are holding their ground. Theyre standing for what they believe in as strong-minded individuals with a reciprocal goal in mind (Doc 11). Although most would agree that the Greek revolution was a positive thing, there are some people that are on the complete opposite side of things.These people think that the Turkish reign was not too overbearing, and that the Greeks couldve easily stayed under their control. A Turkish sultan named Mustapha III, in 1765 made orders very clear to the governor of Yankee Greece to try and stop the revolts being made by the Greeks. He went on to describe the problems that the Greek population had been causing such as robberies. He thought that the Greek revolution had caused more problems than it solved, and that it shouldve been stopped early. Because of the fact that he was a sultan of the Ottoman Empire I find it some obvious that he was against the Greeks in their r evolts.Mustapha wanted what was best for his nation and people (Doc 2). In Vahids opinion, a Turkish governor, the revolution of the Greeks was goaded by what he calls drunkards, meaning that he didnt take the rebellions seriously. Again, being of Turkish government, he would favor the Ottoman side of things (Doc 9). During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries Greece was driven to rebel against their previous rulers the Ottoman Turks. Their culture and everything they took pride in was empty in the Turks eyes.They felt they had to start a revolution to gain underpin the rights they deserved. During this revolt, they living conditions were not as good as they couldve been. In fact they were difficult to deal with, but this had only been a small overleap for the Greek population who was determined to gain independence. Nothing could stand in their way, as they were a fearless, courageous nation. Finally, after suffering through nine years of antagonizing war and treachery, the G reeks gained their independence from the Ottoman Turks and started to create a government as a unified country.